fbpx

Bridging Gap

Bridging Gap

Integrated Marketing Communication Agency.

We craft beautifully useful marketing and digital products that grow businesses.

T (917) 720 3126
Email: gaurav.sodhi@bridginggap.in

Bridging gap (B.Gap Pvt. Ltd.)
244 Fifth Avenue, Manhattan New York, NY, US 10001

Get in touch: +91-983-383-0474
  • MY CART
    No products in cart.
  • About us
  • Voice Your Business
    • India
    • USA
  • Services
    • Web & Mobile Development
    • SEO Services
    • Graphic Design
    • Marketing
      • Experiential Marketing (Events)
      • Email Marketing
      • Social Media Marketing
      • Hotel Marketing
    • Social Media
    • Brand Building
  • Portfolio
    • Strategic Creations
  • Beyond the Bridge
  • Contact us
Enquiry
0
Tuesday, 01 February 2022 / Published in Uncategorized

Opinion | How Crypto Became the New Subprime – The New York Times

Advertisement
Supported by
Paul Krugman
By Paul Krugman
Opinion Columnist
If the stock market isn’t the economy — which it isn’t — then cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin really, really aren’t the economy. Still, crypto has become a pretty big asset class (and yielded huge capital gains to many buyers); by last fall the combined market value of cryptocurrencies had reached almost $3 trillion.
Since then, however, prices have crashed, wiping out around $1.3 trillion in market capitalization. As of Thursday morning, Bitcoin’s price was almost halfway down from its November peak. So who is being hurt by this crash, and what might it do to the economy?
Well, I’m seeing uncomfortable parallels with the subprime crisis of the 2000s. No, crypto doesn’t threaten the financial system — the numbers aren’t big enough to do that. But there’s growing evidence that the risks of crypto are falling disproportionately on people who don’t know what they are getting into and are poorly positioned to handle the downside.
What’s this crypto thing about? There are many ways to make digital payments, from Apple Pay and Google Pay to Venmo. Mainstream payment schemes, however, rely on a third party — usually your bank — to verify that you actually own the assets you’re transferring. Cryptocurrencies use complex coding to supposedly do away with the need for these third parties.
Skeptics wonder why this is necessary and argue that crypto ends up being an awkward, expensive way to do things you could have done more easily in other ways, which is why cryptocurrencies still have few legal applications 13 years after Bitcoin was introduced. The response, in my experience, tends to take the form of incomprehensible word salad.
Recent developments in El Salvador, which adopted Bitcoin as legal tender a few months ago, seem to bolster the skeptics: Residents attempting to use the currency find themselves facing huge transaction fees. Still, crypto has been effectively marketed: It manages both to seem futuristic and to appeal to old-style goldbug fears that the government will inflate away your savings, and huge past gains have drawn in investors worried about missing out. So crypto has become a large asset class even though nobody can clearly explain what legitimate purpose it’s for.
But now crypto has crashed. Maybe it will recover and soar to new heights, as it has in the past. For now, however, prices are way down. Who are the losers?
As I said, there are disturbing echoes of the subprime crash 15 years ago.
Crypto is unlikely to cause an overall economic crisis. It’s a big world out there, and even $1.3 trillion in losses is only about six percent of U.S. gross domestic product, a hit that’s an order of magnitude smaller than the effects of falling home prices when the housing bubble burst. And activities like Bitcoin mining, while environmentally destructive, are economically trivial compared with home-building, whose plunge played a large role in causing the Great Recession.
Still, some people are being hurt. Who are they?
Investors in crypto seem to be different from investors in other risky assets, like stocks, who consist disproportionately of affluent, college-educated whites. According to a survey by the research organization NORC, 44 percent of crypto investors are nonwhite, and 55 percent don’t have a college degree. This matches up with anecdotal evidence that crypto investing has become remarkably popular among minority groups and the working class.
NORC says that this is great, that “cryptocurrencies are opening up investing opportunities for more diverse investors.” But I remember the days when subprime mortgage lending was similarly celebrated — when it was hailed as a way to open up the benefits of homeownership to previously excluded groups.
It turned out, however, that many borrowers didn’t understand what they were getting into. Ned Gramlich, a Federal Reserve official who famously warned in vain about the growing financial dangers, asked, “Why are the most risky loan products sold to the least sophisticated borrowers?” He then declared, “The question answers itself.” Homeownership dropped sharply once the bubble burst.
And cryptocurrencies, with their huge price fluctuations seemingly unrelated to fundamentals, are about as risky as an asset class can get.
Now, maybe those of us who still can’t see what cryptocurrencies are good for other than money laundering and tax evasion are just missing the picture. Maybe the rising valuation (although not use) of Bitcoin and its rivals represents something more than a bubble, in which people buy an asset simply because other people have made money off that asset in the past. And it’s OK for investors to bet against the skeptics.
But these investors should be people who are both well equipped to make that judgment and financially secure enough to bear the losses if it turns out that the skeptics are right.
Unfortunately, that’s not what is happening. And if you ask me, regulators have made the same mistake they made on subprime: They failed to protect the public against financial products nobody understood, and many vulnerable families may end up paying the price.
The Times is committed to publishing a diversity of letters to the editor. We’d like to hear what you think about this or any of our articles. Here are some tips. And here’s our email: letters@nytimes.com.
Follow The New York Times Opinion section on Facebook, Twitter (@NYTopinion) and Instagram.
Advertisement

source

  • Tweet

What you can read next

Digital marketing expert and author Usman Ghani helps clients succeed – The Jerusalem Post
The Importance Of Animal Nutrition: How To Choose The Right Food For Your Dog? – Harlem World Magazine
New coach to replace Park Hang–seo at 2022 U23 AFF Cup – http://en.vietnamplus.vn/

Recent Posts

  • SEO service in Bandra

    Beyond Keywords: How Search Intent is Shaping SEO Strategies in 2025

    In the dynamic realm of digital marketing, unde...
  • Best Hotel Marketing Agency

    OTA vs Direct bookings- How Hotels can achieve Maximum Revenue ?

    Best Hotel Marketing Agency...
  • Google Vs SEO

    Google Ads vs. SEO – Which Is Better? Get Expert Strategy from Bridging Gap, Mumbai

    In the fast-paced world of digital marketing, b...
  • best digital marketing agency in Delhi

    Branding Beyond the Logo: The Emotional Triggers That Make Customers Buy

    Introduction to Branding Branding is much more ...
  • Bridging Gap: 40% Revenue Increase for a Resort Through Smart OTA Strategies

    The hospitality industry is fiercely competitiv...

Archives

  • February 2025
  • January 2025
  • December 2024
  • May 2024
  • April 2022
  • March 2022
  • February 2022
  • January 2022
  • December 2021
  • June 2017

Categories

  • Branding
  • Marketing
  • News
  • SEO
  • Social Media
  • Uncategorized
  • Web Design

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Company
  • About us
  • Voice Your Business
  • Services
  • Portfolio
  • Beyond the Bridge
  • Contact us
Social
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
Support
  • FAQ
  • Terms
  • Privacy

Bridging Gap

Call USA :+1-347-587-8585

Call IND: +91-983-383-0474

info@bridginggap.in

© 2025 All rights Reserved @Bridging Gap.

TOP